People v. Castro

1 A.D.2d 525, 767 N.Y.S.2d 272
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Castro. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 A.D.2d 935

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered June 4, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Younger, 299 AD2d 431 [2002]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castro, 1 A.D.2d 525, 767 N.Y.S.2d 272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

1 A.D.2d 525 (People v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Younger
299 A.D.2d 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)