People v. Castro

245 A.D.2d 123, 665 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12987
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Castro. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 A.D.2d 445

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J., on motion; Allen Alpert, J., at Parker hearing; Ira Beal, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered April 12, 1994, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

As the People correctly concede, defendant was improperly tried in absentia (see, People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141). Accordingly, a new trial was required. Summary denial of defendant’s motion to suppress the undercover officer’s confirmatory identification was proper (see, People v Wharton, 74 NY2d 921, 922-923; People v Morales, 37 NY2d 262, 271-272). Defendant’s court closure claim is rendered academic by the above disposition. Should the People seek a closure order on retrial, a new hearing would be required. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castro, 245 A.D.2d 123, 665 N.Y.S.2d 888, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 123 (People v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Morales
333 N.E.2d 339 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Parker
440 N.E.2d 1313 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Wharton
549 N.E.2d 462 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)