People v. Castro

425 N.E.2d 888, 53 N.Y.2d 1046, 442 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2567
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1981·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[1048] OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed. The police had reasonable suspicion to warrant the stop which was reasonably related in scope and intensity to the circumstances surrounding the encounter. Based on reasonable suspicion, the police were entitled to neutralize defendant for their own protection as well as that of bystanders (People v Chestnut, 51 NY2d 14).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castro, 425 N.E.2d 888, 53 N.Y.2d 1046, 442 N.Y.S.2d 500, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2567 (N.Y. 1981).

425 N.E.2d 888 (People v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Scott
197 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Castro
101 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Williams
97 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Stone
86 A.D.2d 347 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)