People v. Castro
60 Cal. 118, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 416
Opinion
The defendant was convicted in the Court below of the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed upon a child of the age of eleven years. We have carefully examined the evidence in the case, and are of the opinion that it was insufficient to justify the verdict of guilty. (People v. Benson, 6 Cal. 221; People v. Hamilton, 46 id. 540; People v. Ardaga and Gamez, 51 id. 371.)
The judgment and. order are reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Castro, 60 Cal. 118, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 416 (Cal. 1882).
60 Cal. 118 (People v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Dasey
242 P. 876 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
People v. Price
147 P. 591 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
State v. Trego
138 P. 1124 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1914)
People v. Moore
100 P. 688 (California Supreme Court, 1909)