People v. Castro
This text of 60 Cal. 118 (People v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted in the Court below of the crime of rape, alleged to have been committed upon a child of the age of eleven years. We have carefully examined the evidence in the case, and are of the opinion that it was insufficient to justify the verdict of guilty. (People v. Benson, 6 Cal. 221; People v. Hamilton, 46 id. 540; People v. Ardaga and Gamez, 51 id. 371.)
The judgment and. order are reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cal. 118, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castro-cal-1882.