People v. Castor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Castor

207 A.D.2d 357, 616 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8052

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 1, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 357 (People v. Castor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Castor, 207 A.D.2d 357, 616 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8052 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), both imposed February 4, 1992.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

[358]*358Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal as part of the plea agreements (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, having pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentences which were thereafter imposed, the defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentences were excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), both imposed February 4, 1992.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

[358]*358Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal as part of the plea agreements (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). In any event, having pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentences which were thereafter imposed, the defendant has no basis to now complain that his sentences were excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 357, 616 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castor-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack