People v. Castimore

166 A.D.2d 915, 561 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12223
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress. The record establishes that defendant was not so intoxicated that he was unable to comprehend the Miranda warnings (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436) he was given and that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his rights (see, People v Schompert, 19 NY2d 300, 305-307, cert [916] denied 389 US 874; People v Williams, 147 AD2d 515, 516; People v Perry, 144 AD2d 706). We also conclude that the verdict was supported by the weight of the evidence and that the evidence was legally sufficient (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Lomanto; J. — assault, first degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castimore, 166 A.D.2d 915, 561 N.Y.S.2d 679, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

166 A.D.2d 915 (People v. Castimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Denis
181 A.D.2d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)