People v. Castillo

2018 NY Slip Op 3697
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Castillo. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 A.D.3d 1802
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 2018·No. 2017-01534·Published

Opinion

People v Castillo (2018 NY Slip Op 03697)
People v Castillo
2018 NY Slip Op 03697
Decided on May 23, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 23, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-01534
(Ind. No. 16-00339)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jonathan Castillo, appellant.


Del Atwell, East Hampton, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Jennifer Spencer and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered February 2, 2017, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 141). A valid waiver of the right to appeal forfeits the right to challenge the effectiveness of trial counsel, except insofar as counsel's alleged deficiencies affected the voluntariness of the defendant's plea of guilty itself (see People v Jessamy, 137 AD3d 1056, 1056; see also People v Thompson, 150 AD3d 1156). Here, the defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel by counsel's failure to apply for a certificate of relief from disabilities at the time of sentencing, since his contention does not relate to the voluntariness of his plea (see People v Levy, 91 AD3d 793, 793-794).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castillo, 2018 NY Slip Op 3697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 3697 (People v. Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Jessamy
137 A.D.3d 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Thompson
2017 NY Slip Op 4151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Levy
91 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)