People v. Castellanos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Castellanos

143 A.D.2d 355, 532 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9157

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 143 A.D.2d 355 (People v. Castellanos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Castellanos, 143 A.D.2d 355, 532 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), rendered November 25, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress statements made by him to the police and physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In our view, the testimony adduced by the People at the defendant’s suppression hearing demonstrated that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant for committing, at the very least, the class E felony of tampering with physical evidence (Penal Law § 215.40; People v Nicholas, 70 AD2d 804). Under the circumstances, and contrary to the defendant’s argument at the suppression hearing, his statements to the police (an oral statement made shortly after the arrest and a videotaped statement made about four hours later), after he was advised of his Miranda rights, and certain physical evidence subsequently discovered by the police during a consensual search of the defendant’s mother’s apartment, were not the fruits of an illegal arrest. Accordingly, the suppression court properly denied suppression. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Kunzeman and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Browne, J.), rendered November 25, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress statements made by him to the police and physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In our view, the testimony adduced by the People at the defendant’s suppression hearing demonstrated that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant for committing, at the very least, the class E felony of tampering with physical evidence (Penal Law § 215.40; People v Nicholas, 70 AD2d 804). Under the circumstances, and contrary to the defendant’s argument at the suppression hearing, his statements to the police (an oral statement made shortly after the arrest and a videotaped statement made about four hours later), after he was advised of his Miranda rights, and certain physical evidence subsequently discovered by the police during a consensual search of the defendant’s mother’s apartment, were not the fruits of an illegal arrest. Accordingly, the suppression court properly denied suppression. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Kunzeman and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A.D.2d 355, 532 N.Y.S.2d 319, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castellanos-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack