People v. Castellano
This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 05730 (People v. Castellano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Castellano |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 05730 |
| Decided on November 15, 2024 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on November 15, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CURRAN, OGDEN, DELCONTE, AND HANNAH, JJ.
777 KA 21-00807
v
TRISHA A. CASTELLANO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (CARA A. WALDMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JAMES B. RITTS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Frederick G. Reed, A.J.), rendered September 12, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant upon her plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon a plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]), defendant contends that her waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that her contention concerning the severity of her sentence is thus properly before us. Inasmuch as defendant has completed serving the sentence imposed, her contention that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe has been rendered moot (see People v McMullen, 224 AD3d 1280, 1281 [4th Dept 2024]; People v Demay, 201 AD3d 1351, 1351-1352 [4th Dept 2022]; People v Seppe, 188 AD3d 1716, 1716 [4th Dept 2020]). Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's challenge to her sentence has not been rendered moot and that she did not validly waive her right to appeal, we would conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe (see e.g. People v Ismael, 210 AD3d 1528, 1529-1530 [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: November 15, 2024
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2024 NY Slip Op 05730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castellano-nyappdiv-2024.