People v. Castellano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Castellano

284 A.D.2d 406, 726 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6101

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 284 A.D.2d 406 (People v. Castellano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Castellano, 284 A.D.2d 406, 726 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6101 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the [407]*407defendant from a judgment of the Supre • ; >>*.. 5, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered February 27 wicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a ; v vehicle in the first degree and criminal possession of stc i iii property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the admission of evidence regarding an uncharged crime is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, any error in admitting this evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Castro, 261 AD2d 553; People v Davis, 259 AD2d 706; People v Lunsford, 244 AD2d 507).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the [407]*407defendant from a judgment of the Supre • ; >>*.. 5, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered February 27 wicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a ; v vehicle in the first degree and criminal possession of stc i iii property in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the admission of evidence regarding an uncharged crime is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, any error in admitting this evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Castro, 261 AD2d 553; People v Davis, 259 AD2d 706; People v Lunsford, 244 AD2d 507).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 406, 726 N.Y.S.2d 281, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castellano-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack