People v. Casteline

184 N.Y.S.3d 640, 2023 NY Slip Op 01711
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 30, 2023
Docket113129
StatusPublished

This text of 184 N.Y.S.3d 640 (People v. Casteline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Casteline, 184 N.Y.S.3d 640, 2023 NY Slip Op 01711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Casteline (2023 NY Slip Op 01711)
People v Casteline
2023 NY Slip Op 01711
Decided on March 30, 2023
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:March 30, 2023

113129

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Caleb A. Casteline, Appellant.


Calendar Date:February 10, 2023
Before:Garry, P.J., Lynch, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Fisher, JJ.

John R. Trice, Elmira, for appellant.

Michael A. Korchak, District Attorney, Binghamton (Geoffrey B. Rossi of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Kevin P. Dooley, J.), rendered January 28, 2021, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of manslaughter in the first degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, to a prison term of 20 years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [3d Dept 1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Fisher, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Beaty
5 N.E.3d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 N.Y.S.3d 640, 2023 NY Slip Op 01711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-casteline-nyappdiv-2023.