People v. Castaldo

72 A.D.2d 568, 420 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13647
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 72 A.D.2d 568 (People v. Castaldo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Castaldo, 72 A.D.2d 568, 420 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 23, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the conviction of robbery in the first degree to a conviction of robbery in the second degree and by vacating the sentence imposed thereon. As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to Criminal Term for resentence. Defendant was charged with robbery in the first degree based on the use or threatened immediate use of a dangerous instrument (see Penal Law, § 160.15, subd 3). Whether a particular object is a "dangerous instrument” (Penal Law, § 10.00, subd 13) must be determined by its use under the circumstances (People v Cwikla, 60 AD2d 40, revd on other grounds 46 NY2d 434). Here, there was not sufficient evidence to show that the unloaded sawed-off rifle was readily capable of causing death or serious injury under the circumstances in which it was used (see People v Green, 56 AD2d 610). The gun was brandished at the two robbery victims. However, it was unloaded and no attempt or threat was made to use the gun as a club. The capacity of the sawed-off rifle to inflict death or serious injury was not established in this case. Nevertheless, since the crime of robbery in the second degree was established beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment has been modified accordingly. Lazer, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Weng
215 A.D.3d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Williams
2017 NY Slip Op 7758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Alston
270 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Wilson
252 A.D.2d 241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Lopez
535 N.E.2d 1328 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. O'Leary
137 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Cotarelo
129 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Hirniak
118 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Brown
100 A.D.2d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Stephens
97 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Knowles
79 A.D.2d 116 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Siler
76 A.D.2d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Brown
103 Misc. 2d 871 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A.D.2d 568, 420 N.Y.S.2d 742, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castaldo-nyappdiv-1979.