People v. Cassell
This text of 277 A.D.2d 842 (People v. Cassell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the labeling as barbiturates of the pills sold by defendant without a prescription, in violation of section 6814 of the Education Law, [843]*843of which he has been convicted, it is not necessary to decide whether section 6825 of the Education Law applies to such a situation. Here, by the label, defendant has admitted that he sold barbiturates. Judgment unanimously affirmed. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cassell-nyappdiv-1950.