People v. Caslin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Caslin

201 A.D.2d 757, 608 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 757 (People v. Caslin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Caslin, 201 A.D.2d 757, 608 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schuyler County (Callanan, Sr., J.), rendered September 6, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

We reject defendant’s argument that his confession should have been suppressed at the Huntley hearing because it was obtained as a result of an impermissible promise made by law enforcement personnel. We find no evidence that County Court abused its considerable discretion by crediting the contrary testimony of the investigating police officer. Because defendant’s statement to the police was voluntary, there is no basis for reversing defendant’s conviction.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schuyler County (Callanan, Sr., J.), rendered September 6, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

We reject defendant’s argument that his confession should have been suppressed at the Huntley hearing because it was obtained as a result of an impermissible promise made by law enforcement personnel. We find no evidence that County Court abused its considerable discretion by crediting the contrary testimony of the investigating police officer. Because defendant’s statement to the police was voluntary, there is no basis for reversing defendant’s conviction.

Mikoll, J. P., White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 757, 608 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caslin-nyappdiv-1994.