Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Caslin

People v. Caslin

234 N.E.2d 253, 21 N.Y.2d 662, 287 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1025
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 28, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 234 N.E.2d 253 (People v. Caslin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Caslin, 234 N.E.2d 253, 21 N.Y.2d 662, 287 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1025 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and the information dismissed upon the ground that the information failed to state facts sufficient to allege a violation of section 483 (subd. 1) of the Penal Law (People v. Onody, 296 N. Y. 305; People v. Hopkins, 208 App. Div. 438).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke and Bergan. Judges Scileppi, Keating and Breitel dissent and vote to affirm. (See People v. Bergerson, 17 Ñ Y 2d 398.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Onody
73 N.E.2d 35 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
People v. Hopkins
208 A.D. 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 N.E.2d 253, 21 N.Y.2d 662, 287 N.Y.S.2d 91, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caslin-ny-1967.