People v. Casiano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Casiano

111 A.D.2d 105, 489 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51240

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 105 (People v. Casiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Casiano, 111 A.D.2d 105, 489 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter J. McQuillan, J.), rendered May 18, 1983, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him as a second violent felony offender to an indeterminate term of 12 to 24 years’ imprisonment, unanimously affirmed. Appealable issues were raised in the pro se brief submitted by defendant which were considered by the court. They were sufficiently answered in the People’s responding brief. Accordingly, the application by defendant’s assigned counsel to withdraw on the basis of People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833) is denied. Defendant’s belated motion for assignment of new counsel to argue orally the points raised in his supplemental pro se brief is denied as unnecessary. As noted, the court has fully considered the points raised in the pro se brief. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch and Fein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter J. McQuillan, J.), rendered May 18, 1983, convicting defendant, after jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him as a second violent felony offender to an indeterminate term of 12 to 24 years’ imprisonment, unanimously affirmed. Appealable issues were raised in the pro se brief submitted by defendant which were considered by the court. They were sufficiently answered in the People’s responding brief. Accordingly, the application by defendant’s assigned counsel to withdraw on the basis of People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833) is denied. Defendant’s belated motion for assignment of new counsel to argue orally the points raised in his supplemental pro se brief is denied as unnecessary. As noted, the court has fully considered the points raised in the pro se brief. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch and Fein, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 105, 489 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-casiano-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack