People v. Carver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carver

210 A.D.2d 710, 621 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12737

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 710 (People v. Carver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carver, 210 A.D.2d 710, 621 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.), rendered December 13, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

We reject defendant’s claim that his negotiated sentence of 3 to 9 years in prison is unduly harsh or excessive. The sentence was within statutory guidelines and we note that defendant did not receive the harshest permissible sentence. Under the circumstances presented here, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Reilly, Jr., J.), rendered December 13, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

We reject defendant’s claim that his negotiated sentence of 3 to 9 years in prison is unduly harsh or excessive. The sentence was within statutory guidelines and we note that defendant did not receive the harshest permissible sentence. Under the circumstances presented here, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 710, 621 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carver-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack