People v. Carvajal
This text of 203 A.D.2d 475 (People v. Carvajal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), imposed January 31, 1992.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74, 81-82).
In any event, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to waive the mandatory surcharge (see, Penal Law § 60.35; CPL 420.35; People v Rodney, 156 AD2d 732). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Lawrence, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 A.D.2d 475, 610 N.Y.S.2d 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carvajal-nyappdiv-1994.