People v. Caruso
This text of 154 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Caruso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of criminal facilitation in the fourth degree. The sentence imposed was legal, and we decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice to modify that sentence. The other issues raised by defendant were previously resolved by this court on the appeal of a codefendant (see, People v Rogers, 152 AD2d 947). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — criminal possession of stolen property, fifth degree; criminal facilitation, fourth degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
154 A.D.2d 932, 546 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caruso-nyappdiv-1989.