People v. Caruso

154 A.D.2d 932, 546 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13010
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Caruso. Read the opinion of the Court — 174 A.D.2d 1051

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of criminal facilitation in the fourth degree. The sentence imposed was legal, and we decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice to modify that sentence. The other issues raised by defendant were previously resolved by this court on the appeal of a codefendant (see, People v Rogers, 152 AD2d 947). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. — criminal possession of stolen property, fifth degree; criminal facilitation, fourth degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Caruso, 154 A.D.2d 932, 546 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

154 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Caruso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rogers
152 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)