People v. Cartledge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cartledge

147 A.D.2d 906, 537 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1162

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A.D.2d 906 (People v. Cartledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cartledge, 147 A.D.2d 906, 537 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not err in permitting a [907]*907police officer to testify regarding statements and gestures made by a stabbing victim some 20 to 30 minutes after the event. Neither the lapse of time between the event and the statements nor the manner of police questioning diminished the stressful impact of the event upon the victim, and the communications were properly admitted as excited utterances (People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court did not err in permitting a [907]*907police officer to testify regarding statements and gestures made by a stabbing victim some 20 to 30 minutes after the event. Neither the lapse of time between the event and the statements nor the manner of police questioning diminished the stressful impact of the event upon the victim, and the communications were properly admitted as excited utterances (People v Brown, 70 NY2d 513).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J. — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.D.2d 906, 537 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cartledge-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack