People v. Carter

201 A.D.3d 484, 156 N.Y.S.3d 835, 2022 NY Slip Op 00142
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 11, 2022
DocketInd. Nos. 48/18, 2366/18 Appeal No. 15002 Case No. 2019-797
StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.3d 484 (People v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Carter, 201 A.D.3d 484, 156 N.Y.S.3d 835, 2022 NY Slip Op 00142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Carter (2022 NY Slip Op 00142)
People v Carter
2022 NY Slip Op 00142
Decided on January 11, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 11, 2022
Before: Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Moulton, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Ind. Nos. 48/18, 2366/18 Appeal No. 15002 Case No. 2019-797

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Aubrey Carter, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Bryan S. Furst of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Samuel Z. Goldfine of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J.), rendered November 27, 2018, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 12 to 14 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545 [2019], cert denied 589 US —&mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016]), which forecloses review of his excessive sentence claim. In any event, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. However, based on our own

interest of justice powers and the People's consent, we vacate the surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing (see People v Chirinos, 190 AD3d 434 [1st Dept 2021]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: January 11, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bryant
68 N.E.3d 60 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.3d 484, 156 N.Y.S.3d 835, 2022 NY Slip Op 00142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carter-nyappdiv-2022.