People v. Carter

2017 NY Slip Op 9149, 156 A.D.3d 898, 65 N.Y.S.3d 760
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 A.D.3d 706
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2017·No. 2016-04097·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed March 30, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; People v Santeramo, 153 AD3d 1286, 1286-1287 [2017]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carter, 2017 NY Slip Op 9149, 156 A.D.3d 898, 65 N.Y.S.3d 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 9149 (People v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Santeramo
2017 NY Slip Op 6465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)