People v. Carter
89 A.D.3d 1071, 933 N.Y.2d 593
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 A.D.3d 1103 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2011·Published
Opinion
[1072]*1072We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there is no nonfrivolous issue that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2d Dept 2011]; People v Bowles, 89 AD3d 171 [2d Dept 2011]; People v Thomas, 88 AD3d 974 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Eng and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Carter, 89 A.D.3d 1071, 933 N.Y.2d 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 1071 (People v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Thomas
88 A.D.3d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Bowles
89 A.D.3d 171 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)