People v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carter

4 A.D.3d 682, 772 N.Y.S.2d 615, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2034

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 682 (People v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carter, 4 A.D.3d 682, 772 N.Y.S.2d 615, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Hoye, J.), rendered May 8, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

On March 26, 2002, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to 10 years in prison to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. On appeal, defendant maintains that his plea should be vacated in the interest of justice because he was not informed of the mandatory period of postrelease supervision. We decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction in this matter inasmuch as defendant failed to object at the time of sentencing or move to withdraw his plea (see People v LaValley, 2 AD3d 1212 [2003]; People v Van Gorden, 307 AD2d 547, 548 [2003]).

Crew III, J.P, Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Hoye, J.), rendered May 8, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

On March 26, 2002, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to 10 years in prison to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. On appeal, defendant maintains that his plea should be vacated in the interest of justice because he was not informed of the mandatory period of postrelease supervision. We decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction in this matter inasmuch as defendant failed to object at the time of sentencing or move to withdraw his plea (see People v LaValley, 2 AD3d 1212 [2003]; People v Van Gorden, 307 AD2d 547, 548 [2003]).

Crew III, J.P, Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 682, 772 N.Y.S.2d 615, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carter-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack