People v. Carter

283 A.D.2d 514, 724 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5020
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), rendered May 21, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, without a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a Wade hearing (see, United States v Wade, 388 US 218) upon finding that the confirmatory identification of the defendant was made by undercover officers at the police precinct three hours after the arrest (see, People v Wharton, 74 NY2d 921, 923). The dangers of misidentification are greatly reduced when those who view the suspect are law enforcement officers [515]*515trained to be accurate and objective in their observations (see, People v McDonald, 147 AD2d 500).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carter, 283 A.D.2d 514, 724 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 514 (People v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
294 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)