People v. Carter

208 A.D.2d 944, 618 N.Y.S.2d 582
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 191 A.D.2d 640

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered October 5, 1993, convicting him of burglary in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that the circumstantial evidence that was presented in this case is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those found in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carter, 208 A.D.2d 944, 618 N.Y.S.2d 582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 944 (People v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)