People v. Carter

499 Mich. 864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 913 N.W.2d 292
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 8, 2016·No. Nos. 151591 and 151592; Court of Appeals Nos. 317812 and 317828·Published

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand these cases to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VT of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have [865]*865imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carter, 499 Mich. 864 (Mich. 2016).

499 Mich. 864 (People v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lockridge
870 N.W.2d 502 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2015)