People v. Carter
This text of 715 N.W.2d 777 (People v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William Jermichael CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether defendant is entitled to resentencing, and (2) whether this Court's statement in People v. Francisco, 474 Mich. 82, 89, n. 8, 711 N.W.2d 44 (2006), that resentencing is not required where the trial court clearly indicates that it would have imposed the same sentence regardless of the scoring error, applies to situations where the trial court so concludes only after the original sentencing proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
715 N.W.2d 777, 475 Mich. 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carter-mich-2006.