People v. Carswell

105 A.D.2d 844, 482 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20970
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 26, 1984·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), rendered August 1,1983, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant contends that it was error for the trial court to have permitted testimony concerning the voided arrest of defendant in connection with the recovery of the complaining witness’ stolen automobile. However, this testimony was admissible to complete the narrative of the events leading to the spontaneous identification by the complaining witness of defendant at the precinct house (People v Gines, 36 NY2d 932).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carswell, 105 A.D.2d 844, 482 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 844 (People v. Carswell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
125 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Cumberbatch
120 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Vernon
115 A.D.2d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)