People v. Carroll
This text of 20 N.W. 575 (People v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent was convicted of burglary ■and larceny in the Superior Court at Grand Bapids. The record contains a bill of exceptions but does not purport to give all the testimony.
On the trial, the counsel for the People gave testimony tending to show that the money stolen was found upon the person of the respondent. This was objected to by the respondent’s counsel, on the ground that possession of stolen property was not evidence of burglary. The testimony was admitted in the case, and exception was taken. It was proper testimony to be given with other evidence in the ■case, to prove the respondent guilty of the crime charged, ¡and no error was committed in receiving it. It is only necessary to say further, that the other objections and exceptions of counsel for respondent were not well taken, and need not be further considered.
The judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 N.W. 575, 54 Mich. 334, 1884 Mich. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carroll-mich-1884.