People v. Carrington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carrington

265 A.D.2d 420, 696 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10189

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered January 14, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the prosecutor improperly cross-examined him with respect to his pretrial silence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Torres, 220 AD2d 263), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Otero, 225 AD2d 489; People v Torres, supra; People v Punter, 222 AD2d 242; People v Trigger, 210 AD2d 359; People v Timmons, 149 AD2d 746).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 85 NY2d 909), or without merit (see, CPL 270.15 [3]; People v Page, 72 NY2d 69, 73-74; People v Oyewole, 220 AD2d 624; People v Green, 216 AD2d 170; see also, People v Reynoso, 231 AD2d 592). Thompson, J. P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered January 14, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the prosecutor improperly cross-examined him with respect to his pretrial silence is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Torres, 220 AD2d 263), and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Otero, 225 AD2d 489; People v Torres, supra; People v Punter, 222 AD2d 242; People v Trigger, 210 AD2d 359; People v Timmons, 149 AD2d 746).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 85 NY2d 909), or without merit (see, CPL 270.15 [3]; People v Page, 72 NY2d 69, 73-74; People v Oyewole, 220 AD2d 624; People v Green, 216 AD2d 170; see also, People v Reynoso, 231 AD2d 592). Thompson, J. P., Friedmann, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

People v. Carrington, 265 A.D.2d 420, 696 N.Y.S.2d 849, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

265 A.D.2d 420 (People v. Carrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related