Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Carrasquillo

People v. Carrasquillo

278 A.D.2d 947, 722 N.Y.S.2d 928, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13726
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 947 (People v. Carrasquillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Carrasquillo, 278 A.D.2d 947, 722 N.Y.S.2d 928, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not met his burden of demonstrating that there is “reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Onondaga County (CPL 230.20[2]). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn, an appropriate motion may then be made. The relief requested in the motion is premature (see People v Mateo, 239 AD2d 965; see also, People v DiPiazza, 24 NY2d 342). Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner and Scudder, JJ. (Filed Dec. 19, 2000.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Mateo
239 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 947, 722 N.Y.S.2d 928, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carrasquillo-nyappdiv-2000.