People v. Carrasco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carrasco

83 A.D.2d 809, 441 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15165

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 13, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 A.D.2d 809 (People v. Carrasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carrasco, 83 A.D.2d 809, 441 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Zimmerman, J.) rendered February 23, 1979 upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree (four counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree, sentencing the defendant, respectively, to concurrent terms of 8 Vs to 25 years plus a fine of $5,000 or an additional year on the first robbery count, and 5 to 15 years on the attempted robbery count, unanimously modified, on the law and in the interest of justice, by vacating so much thereof as imposed, with respect to the first robbery in the first degree count, a fine, and in default thereof an additional year of imprisonment, and otherwise affirmed. As the District Attorney concedes, the maximum sentence for a robbery in the first degree count is 25 years. Accordingly, it was not proper to add thereto the additional one year. (CPL 420.10, subd 3, par [d].) While a fine in itself would be proper (see People v Henry, 78 AD2d 829 [dissent]), inasmuch as it is tied to a consecutive one-year term which would not be authorized, we also modify to vacate the fine. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Zimmerman, J.) rendered February 23, 1979 upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree (four counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree, sentencing the defendant, respectively, to concurrent terms of 8 Vs to 25 years plus a fine of $5,000 or an additional year on the first robbery count, and 5 to 15 years on the attempted robbery count, unanimously modified, on the law and in the interest of justice, by vacating so much thereof as imposed, with respect to the first robbery in the first degree count, a fine, and in default thereof an additional year of imprisonment, and otherwise affirmed. As the District Attorney concedes, the maximum sentence for a robbery in the first degree count is 25 years. Accordingly, it was not proper to add thereto the additional one year. (CPL 420.10, subd 3, par [d].) While a fine in itself would be proper (see People v Henry, 78 AD2d 829 [dissent]), inasmuch as it is tied to a consecutive one-year term which would not be authorized, we also modify to vacate the fine. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 809, 441 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carrasco-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack