People v. Carr
This text of 112 A.D.2d 774 (People v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judgment reversed, on the law, and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: The testimony convicting defendant of the sale of one tenth of a gram of cocaine was so inconsistent, contradictory and implausible, we find the record as a whole deficient and that guilt has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt as a matter of law (see, People v Reed, 40 NY2d 204, 208; People v Santos, 38 NY2d 173, 176; People v Oyola, 6 NY2d 259, 261).
All concur, except Hancock, Jr., J. P., and Callahan, J., who dissent and vote to affirm, in the following memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D.2d 774, 492 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carr-nyappdiv-1985.