People v. Carpio

39 A.D.3d 433, 835 N.Y.S.2d 107
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 39 A.D.3d 433 (People v. Carpio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Carpio, 39 A.D.3d 433, 835 N.Y.S.2d 107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J), rendered April 11, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, criminal contempt in the first degree (three counts), criminal contempt in the second degree (15 counts) and aggravated harassment in the second degree (13 counts), and sentencing him to a term of five years, consecutive to two consecutive terms of U/s to 4 years, and concurrent with an additional term of lVs to 4 years and 28 concurrent terms of one year, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant failed to raise specific objections to the court’s supplemental jury instructions on the grounds he now raises on appeal, his current claims are unpreserved (see People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273, 280 [1983]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the supplemental instructions were meaningful and conveyed the appropriate legal standards. The court properly explained the elements of burglary and explained that unlawful entry into the premises and intent to commit a crime within the premises were separate elements of the offense (see People v Lewis, 5 NY3d 546, 551 [2005]). The court also properly instructed the jury that the second element of the burglary charge, an intent to commit a crime in the dwelling, could be satisfied by proof that the defendant intended to violate the provision of the order of protection requiring that he stay away from the person named therein. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Fletcher
2018 NY Slip Op 4657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Cajigas
82 A.D.3d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Buchanan v. State
981 A.2d 1098 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2009)
Fong v. Poole
522 F. Supp. 2d 642 (S.D. New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.3d 433, 835 N.Y.S.2d 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carpio-nyappdiv-2007.