People v. Carpenter

61 A.D.2d 887, 402 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10383

Opinion

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant has not on this application met his burden of demonstrating that there is "reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had” in Oswego County (CPL 230.20, subd 2). If it develops during the voir dire that a fair and impartial jury cannot be drawn an appropriate application may then be made. The relief requested in the application before us is now premature (see People v Di Piazza, 24 NY2d 342; People v Hatch, 46 AD2d 721; People v Sekou, 45 AD2d 982, app dsmd 35 NY2d 844). Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ. (Order entered Feb. 13, 1978.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carpenter, 61 A.D.2d 887, 402 N.Y.S.2d 979, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

61 A.D.2d 887 (People v. Carpenter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sekou
321 N.E.2d 786 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. DiPiazza
248 N.E.2d 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Sekou
45 A.D.2d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
People v. Hatch
46 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)