People v. Carozza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carozza

105 A.D.2d 752, 481 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Carozza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carozza, 105 A.D.2d 752, 481 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), rendered December 16,1983, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the People proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he knowingly possessed stolen property. (See People v Valinoti, 26 NY2d 553.) We also note that the sentence imposed here of five years’ probation, and a concurrent term of imprisonment of 10 days was proper. (See People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80.) Mollen, P. J., Titone, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), rendered December 16,1983, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5).

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the People proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he knowingly possessed stolen property. (See People v Valinoti, 26 NY2d 553.) We also note that the sentence imposed here of five years’ probation, and a concurrent term of imprisonment of 10 days was proper. (See People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80.) Mollen, P. J., Titone, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 752, 481 N.Y.S.2d 184, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carozza-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack