People v. Carmody
This text of 90 A.D.3d 1526 (People v. Carmody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]) and criminal sexual act in the third degree (§ 130.40 [2]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea (see People v Bethune, 21 AD3d 1316 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 752 [2005]), that contention lacks merit (see generally People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Defendant received “an advantageous plea and nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel” (id.). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Fahey, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.3d 1526, 934 N.Y.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carmody-nyappdiv-2011.