People v. Carmody

90 A.D.3d 1526, 934 N.Y.2d 893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]) and criminal sexual act in the third degree (§ 130.40 [2]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea (see People v Bethune, 21 AD3d 1316 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 752 [2005]), that contention lacks merit (see generally People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Defendant received “an advantageous plea and nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel” (id.). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Fahey, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carmody, 90 A.D.3d 1526, 934 N.Y.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 1526 (People v. Carmody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WORDEN, ROBERT L., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Worden
91 A.D.3d 1340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)