People v. Carmody

90 A.D.3d 1526, 934 N.Y.2d 893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 A.D.3d 1526 (People v. Carmody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Carmody, 90 A.D.3d 1526, 934 N.Y.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.25 [2]) and criminal sexual act in the third degree (§ 130.40 [2]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel survives his guilty plea (see People v Bethune, 21 AD3d 1316 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 752 [2005]), that contention lacks merit (see generally People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). Defendant received “an advantageous plea and nothing in the record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel” (id.). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Fahey, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WORDEN, ROBERT L., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Worden
91 A.D.3d 1340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 1526, 934 N.Y.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carmody-nyappdiv-2011.