People v. Carmichael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carmichael

288 A.D.2d 54, 732 N.Y.S.2d 345, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 288 A.D.2d 54 (People v. Carmichael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carmichael, 288 A.D.2d 54, 732 N.Y.S.2d 345, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered April 7, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility and identification were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.

Defendant’s remaining argument is similar to an argument rejected by this Court on the codefendant’s appeal (People v Coleman, 288 AD2d 49 [decided herewith), and there is no basis upon which to reach a different conclusion here. Concur— Williams, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered April 7, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility and identification were properly considered by the trier of facts and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.

Defendant’s remaining argument is similar to an argument rejected by this Court on the codefendant’s appeal (People v Coleman, 288 AD2d 49 [decided herewith), and there is no basis upon which to reach a different conclusion here. Concur— Williams, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 54, 732 N.Y.S.2d 345, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carmichael-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack