People v. Carlson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carlson

70 A.D.2d 661, 416 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12130

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Carlson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carlson, 70 A.D.2d 661, 416 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed July 19, 1978, upon his conviction of attempted manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a period of imprisonment of 60 days and probation for an additional 4 years and 10 months. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court to fix the terms and conditions of probation. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed July 19, 1978, upon his conviction of attempted manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite term of imprisonment of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a period of imprisonment of 60 days and probation for an additional 4 years and 10 months. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court to fix the terms and conditions of probation. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 661, 416 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carlson-nyappdiv-1979.