People v. Carlo
68 A.D.3d 892, 889 N.Y.2d 470
Opinion
The defendant’s contention that the court failed to abide by its sentencing promise is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not raise it at the time of sentencing, and did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground (see People v Velez, 64 AD3d 799 [2009]; People v Scott, 39 AD3d 570 [2007]). In any event, that contention, as well as his claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Santucci, Dickerson, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Carlo, 68 A.D.3d 892, 889 N.Y.2d 470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 892 (People v. Carlo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Scott
39 A.D.3d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Velez
64 A.D.3d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)