People v. Carione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carione

105 A.D.2d 843, 482 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20969

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Carione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carione, 105 A.D.2d 843, 482 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence, J.), rendered February 2,1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we reject defendant’s argument that the trial court could not rationally have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he was guilty of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree (see Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and have found them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence, J.), rendered February 2,1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we reject defendant’s argument that the trial court could not rationally have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he was guilty of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the second degree (see Jackson v Virginia, 443 US 307).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and have found them to be without merit. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 843, 482 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carione-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack