People v. Carico
This text of 713 N.W.2d 773 (People v. Carico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert Phillipp CARICO, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The denial is without prejudice to defendant raising the issue of counselless convictions in a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.500 et seq.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
713 N.W.2d 773, 475 Mich. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carico-mich-2006.