People v. Cargill

2019 NY Slip Op 297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 2019
DocketInd. No. 914/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 297 (People v. Cargill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cargill, 2019 NY Slip Op 297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Cargill (2019 NY Slip Op 00297)
People v Cargill
2019 NY Slip Op 00297
Decided on January 16, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 16, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-02699
(Ind. No. 914/13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Bibano Cargill, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Michael Arthus of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Robert Adler on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Charles S. Lopresto, J.), imposed May 6, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341-342; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256).

DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cargill-nyappdiv-2019.