People v. Cardone

500 N.E.2d 867, 68 N.Y.2d 829, 508 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21227
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 7, 1986·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of County Court should be affirmed.

We agree that the Trial Judge did not err in refusing to charge the defense of justification pursuant to Penal Law § 35.05 (1). That statute provides in part that conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal when "[s]uch conduct is required or authorized by law or by a judicial decree”. Defendant’s belief that his conduct was authorized does not warrant submission of a justification charge to the jury (compare, Model Penal Code §3.03 [3] [a]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cardone, 500 N.E.2d 867, 68 N.Y.2d 829, 508 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21227 (N.Y. 1986).

500 N.E.2d 867 (People v. Cardone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cromwell (James)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
People v. Craig
585 N.E.2d 783 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Scutari
148 Misc. 2d 440 (Nassau County District Court, 1990)