People v. Cardillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cardillo

167 A.D.2d 347, 562 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13348

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 5, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 A.D.2d 347 (People v. Cardillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cardillo, 167 A.D.2d 347, 562 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered January 15, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the prosecutor’s reference, during summation, to an item not in evidence, did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242). The defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered January 15, 1987, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the prosecutor’s reference, during summation, to an item not in evidence, did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242). The defendant’s remaining contentions are not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) and we decline to review them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 347, 562 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cardillo-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack