People v. Cardena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cardena

105 A.D.3d 435, 961 N.Y.S.2d 777

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.3d 435 (People v. Cardena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cardena, 105 A.D.3d 435, 961 N.Y.S.2d 777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J), rendered April 4, 2012, resentencing defendant, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of five years, with three years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The court provided a sufficient reduction of sentence pursuant to CEL 440.46. In light of defendant’s criminal history, we perceive no basis for a further reduction.

Concur—Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, Renwick, Richter and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J), rendered April 4, 2012, resentencing defendant, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of five years, with three years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The court provided a sufficient reduction of sentence pursuant to CEL 440.46. In light of defendant’s criminal history, we perceive no basis for a further reduction.

Concur—Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, Renwick, Richter and Román, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.3d 435, 961 N.Y.S.2d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cardena-nyappdiv-2013.