People v. Carbonaro
This text of 237 N.E.2d 360 (People v. Carbonaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United. States, viz.: Whether defendant’s confession admitted into evidence was secured in violation of Ms rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any constitutional right of defendant. [See 21 N Y 2d 271.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 N.E.2d 360, 21 N.Y.2d 971, 290 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carbonaro-ny-1968.