People v. Carbonaro

237 N.E.2d 360, 21 N.Y.2d 971, 290 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1482
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United. States, viz.: Whether defendant’s confession admitted into evidence was secured in violation of Ms rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any constitutional right of defendant. [See 21 N Y 2d 271.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Carbonaro, 237 N.E.2d 360, 21 N.Y.2d 971, 290 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1482 (N.Y. 1968).

237 N.E.2d 360 (People v. Carbonaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Zehner
112 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)