People v. Caple

31 A.D.2d 752, 297 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4800
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered February 21, 1968, convicting him ,of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. A determination by said court denying in part defendant’s motion to suppress evidence has been reviewed on this appeal. Judgment affirmed. On a motion to suppress evidence, while the People are under -the necessity of going forward in the first instance, the ultimate burden of proof by a preponderance of the credible evidence rests with defendant (People v. Merola, 30 A D 2d 963). In our opinion, under -the circumstances presented in the record, there was no abuse of discretion on .the part of the -trial court in refusing to grant appellant’s request for a continuance. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Caple, 31 A.D.2d 752, 297 N.Y.S.2d 498, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

31 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Caple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Haseen N.
251 A.D.2d 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Sanchez
151 Misc. 2d 431 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)