People v. Caparelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Caparelli

23 A.D.2d 853, 259 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4323

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 853 (People v. Caparelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Caparelli, 23 A.D.2d 853, 259 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4323 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 10, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered. In our opinion, the present defendant is in substantially the same position as the defendant in People v. Caparelli (21 A D 2d 882). What was said in that decision relative to the right of a defendant to have an opportunity to ascertain whether a codefendant will testify on his behalf, is applicable to the present case. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 10, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered. In our opinion, the present defendant is in substantially the same position as the defendant in People v. Caparelli (21 A D 2d 882). What was said in that decision relative to the right of a defendant to have an opportunity to ascertain whether a codefendant will testify on his behalf, is applicable to the present case. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 853, 259 N.Y.S.2d 812, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-caparelli-nyappdiv-1965.